Hours tracked
675
20 people over 7 days
Hours per person
33.8
mean across people who tracked
Mean activity
30.3%
Hubstaff keyboard/mouse rate — never scored
PRs opened
50
6 still open
PRs merged
44
88% of opened
Median time to merge
0h
p90 2.1h · open → merge
Median PR size
475
lines added + deleted
Commits
436
17 authors · 65 repos · 7 active days
Lines changed
795,709
context only — never scored
Week by week
Is delivery speeding up or slowing down? Grey bars are weeks with nothing recorded.
Commits
Hours tracked
| Week of | Hours | Opened | Merged | Commits |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-28 | 13 | 2 | 1 | 7 |
| 2026-09-21 | 793 | 61 | 48 | 487 |
What the team is working on
Commits by repository — the honest answer to “what is actually being built”.
| Repository | Commits | Merged | Authors |
|---|---|---|---|
POSITION_INTELLIGENCE | 97 | 14 | 5 |
coxa-hub | 69 | 14 | 2 |
coxa-1touch | 31 | 12 | 2 |
Hubstaff-GitHub-Monitoring | 28 | 0 | 1 |
coxa_crm | 17 | 4 | 2 |
NexusAI | 16 | 0 | 2 |
SMA_Backend | 15 | 0 | 3 |
Marketing-Sponsorship-Automation | 15 | 0 | 1 |
Social_Media_Automations | 12 | 0 | 2 |
puntoecuador.world | 11 | 0 | 2 |
ZeroHumanMultiAgentV3 | 8 | 0 | 2 |
cms | 8 | 0 | 1 |
| +28 more projects with activity → | |||
Team
Signal = 40% output · 20% consistency · 20% quality · 20% focus. Hours and lines are never scored.
| Person | Signal | Components | Hours | Act% | PRs | Merged | Commits | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pankaj Kumar pankaj1touch | 88 | output— consistency57 quality— review— | 51.3 | 24.7 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 4,233 |
| Ankur Kumar ankur1touch | 85 | output— consistency57 quality— review— | 50.7 | 31.6 | 0 | 0 | 45 | 49,835 |
| Pramod Soni PRAMODS0NI | 85 | output— consistency34 quality— review— | 35.1 | 30.2 | 0 | 0 | 33 | 27,588 |
| Anshuman Parmar anshumankyma | 83 | output— consistency54 quality17 review— | 48.2 | 26.3 | 13 | 11 | 74 | 344,195 |
| Harsh Patel harsh-kyma | 83 | output— consistency56 quality22 review— | 41.8 | 31.4 | 31 | 30 | 89 | 81,984 |
| Abhishek Kulkarni Abhishek9302 | 81 | output— consistency50 quality— review— | 37.6 | 24.6 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 10,140 |
| Manish Chandrakar manishKyma | 81 | output— consistency57 quality— review— | 34.0 | 19.6 | 0 | 0 | 37 | 33,000 |
| Aziz Bohra AzizBohraKyma | 80 | output— consistency58 quality100 review— | 41.3 | 35.1 | 3 | 3 | 30 | 32,137 |
14 of 23 people produced code here. 5 have no code account linked and get no signal at all — never a low one.
Evidence confidence 0.55
Runs before anything else. Below the floor no composite score is computed and no alert can fire (AC-05).
50%
Providers linked
w 0.3
100%
Time coverage
w 0.25
100%
Code linkage
w 0.3
0%
Task data
w 0.15
Measured 0.70, capped to 0.55 — no task tracker defines what was supposed to be delivered. The cap is what keeps the gate shut.
The twelve KPIs
Six project KPIs shown. Most need an acceptance event, and nothing here is accepted yet.
First-pass CI rate
28.6%
| Accepted difficulty points | blocked | Nothing meets the acceptance bar in this period: merged + first CI green + at least one review. |
| Median cycle time | blocked | Nothing meets the acceptance bar in this period: merged + first CI green + at least one review. |
| Median review turnaround | blocked | Not one of the 50 PRs opened in this period received a review, so there is no turnaround to measure. |
| Capacity utilisation | blocked | The denominator is contracted hours from employees. |
| Cost per accepted point | blocked | Nothing meets the acceptance bar in this period: merged + first CI green + at least one review. |