E

EmpCloud

conf 0.55

Thunder Marketing · 1Touch-dev

Ankur Kumar

ankurkumar102003@gmail.com

2026-09-23 → 2026-09-30 · showing up to 2026-09-30 · live data last updated 29 Sept, 05:07 UTC

Hours tracked

53.8

7 days tracked

Hours per day

7.7

on days with tracked time

Mean activity

30.8%

never scored

PRs opened

0

in this period

PRs merged

0

none opened

Median time to merge

—

nothing merged

Commits

43

4 repositories

Lines changed

44,987

context only — never scored

Identity

A person is only measurable across the providers they are linked to.

aws 2:Ankurgithub ankur1touchhubstaff Ankur Kumar

Evidence confidence for this person

0.00floor 0.601.00

0.55 against a 0.60 floor — no composite score is computed and no alert can fire for this person (AC-05). Measured 0.70, capped because no task tracker defines the work.

Delivery signal

An input to a conversation, not a verdict.

Steady

85

rank 2 of 14

behind ≤ 77median 8184 ≤ leading
change discipline 18%100
craft 25%100
consistency 12%61
infrastructure 15%63
completed work 22%—
review 8%—

Why this reads as “Steady”

The band is cut from this period's own distribution, not a fixed threshold. The arithmetic is below so it can be checked rather than believed.

85 of 100, ranked 2 of 14 people with a score, against a cohort median of 81. The bands are cut from this period's own distribution, not fixed thresholds: ≤ 77 is behind, ≥ 84 is leading, and this person is in the middle 40% of people with a score this period. With every component at the cohort median this person would score 81; they score 85. No single component moves the score by as much as a point; the position comes from the spread across all of them, not from one weak term. 2 of 6 components (completed work, review) could not be measured at all, so the remaining weights were rescaled — this score rests on 70% of the intended evidence.

A band compares this person to the 14 people who have a score in this window — nothing more. It is not a rating, it does not persist, and it moves when the cohort or the window moves.

How this number was built

Every term is shown with the rows it came from and the cohort figure it was judged against. If a term looks wrong, the tables below are the argument.

ComponentWeightScoreCohort medianEffectComputed from
Change discipline18%1001000median commit 137 lines
Craft25%10099+0.4165 of 165 commits name what they changed
Consistency12%6156+0.9code landed on 31 separate days
Infrastructure15%6350+2.8711 points from 197 AWS changes on 19 days
Completed work22%———not scored — never assigned a task in any connected tracker. Scoring 0 here would read as "delivered nothing" when the truth is that no tracker describes this person’s work.
Review8%———not scored — no review is recorded anywhere in the organisation, so this term has no data for anyone. It is withheld rather than scored 0 — a 0 would read as "does not collaborate".

Effect is a counterfactual, not a share: how many points this person’s score would move if that one component dropped to the cohort median for it. The effects sum to 85 − 81 = 4, where 81 is what this person would score with every one of their components at the cohort median. Negative rows are the reason the total sits where it does. A component with no data is withheld and the remaining weights are rescaled — it is never scored as zero, and it never counts against anyone.

Measured but deliberately not scored: 53.9 hours tracked, 43 commits, 44,987 lines changed, 29.1% activity. The first four measure motion rather than delivery and are trivially inflated. CI is excluded because it exists on a minority of repositories, so scoring it would rank people by which repository they work in. This score cannot see architecture, planning, mentoring, incident response or infrastructure work at all.

Infrastructure work

From CloudTrail — the only record of work that leaves no trace in git.

Weighted points

106

Changes

33

Days

6

Unscored

4

sign-ins, own MFA, shells

Provisioning 5 × 5ptAccess & security 25 × 3ptConfiguration 3 × 2pt

What they actually did

  • ec2 ModifySecurityGroupRules×21 · 63 pts
  • ec2 RunInstances×4 · 20 pts
  • ec2 AuthorizeSecurityGroupIngress×3 · 9 pts
  • ec2 CreateKeyPair×1 · 5 pts
  • ec2 CreateSecurityGroup×1 · 3 pts
  • ec2 AllocateAddress×1 · 2 pts
  • ec2 AssociateAddress×1 · 2 pts
  • ec2 ModifyInstanceCreditSpecification×1 · 2 pts

CloudTrail records the API call, not the intent. It cannot tell a considered change from one corrected a minute later, and it retains 90 days — so an empty earlier period means “not retained”, never “nothing happened”.

Employee KPIs

Six of the twelve. Where a value is absent the reason is stated — never rendered as a zero.

Focused project ratio

conf 0.90

35.2%

18.96h of 53.85h on mapped projects. A project-mapping metric, not a diligence metric.

Evidence confidence

conf 1.00

55%

Below the 0.6 floor, so no composite score is computed and no alert can fire (AC-05).

Accepted difficulty pointsblockedNone of this person's 1 work units reached acceptance (merged + first CI green + ≥1 review).
First-pass acceptanceblockedNothing accepted, so there is no first-pass rate.
Idle classification mixblocked0 of 397 intervals carry a class.
Tokens per accepted pointblockedNo AI usage data connected.

Day by day

Tracked time beside code that landed. Click a day for the raw Hubstaff intervals behind its hours.

DayHoursAct%CommitsPRs openedPRs merged
▸ 2026-09-300.00—000
▸ 2026-09-293.1125.1400
▸ 2026-09-287.8622.4300
▸ 2026-09-275.3428.4900
▸ 2026-09-2610.1630.81200
▸ 2026-09-2510.5727.9800
▸ 2026-09-248.3034.6100
▸ 2026-09-238.5231.4600

Where the time went

Hubstaff project attribution.

Coxa Internship18.9h136 rows
Nexus17.3h131 rows
Thunder Marketing's Project8.9h62 rows
Coxahub4.4h34 rows
Pr distribution CRM1.7h12 rows
N8N1.3h13 rows
Position1.3h9 rows

What was not counted

Commits excluded from output, with the reason stored on the row.

Nothing of this person's was excluded in this window.

Pull requests · 0

The rows behind “merged” and “reviewed before merge”. Every one links to GitHub.

No pull requests opened or merged by this person in this window.

Commits · 43 counted, 0 excluded

Default-branch history only. Work on unmerged PR branches does not appear here — see the pull requests above.

SHARepoMessageWhen+/−Counted
122c669coxa-hubAdd subsector filters, sector-in-bairro pages, and a bairro highlight…2026-09-29+636 −16counted
4eb18b6NexusAIfeat: sign POSITION narrative webhooks, expose narrative routes in Sw…2026-09-29+203 −7counted
20ab0d9coxa-hubDrop Coritiba FC affiliation from public copy and prompts.2026-09-29+103 −112counted
77c5804NexusAIdocs: document strategy/frame/messenger convention for POSITION narra…2026-09-29+393 −0counted
60c53b3coxa_crmServe the public site in English and Portuguese.2026-09-28+3,028 −1,314counted
c95e746coxa-hubfix: stop writing Google review data and skip social CDN photos2026-09-28+129 −221counted
3e8a3d1NexusAIfeat(dossier): ship guided wizard UX with live status updates2026-09-28+819 −163counted
afc7e22coxa-hubfix: parse structured opening hours instead of emitting 'Scraped'2026-09-27+401 −19counted
1c0c4f6NexusAIfix: start Qdrant during EC2 deploy so it survives reboot2026-09-27+6 −0counted
b963071NexusAIfix: start Qdrant during EC2 deploy so it survives reboot2026-09-27+6 −0counted
e17b143coxa-hubfix: native-only aggregateRating and review[] in LocalBusiness JSON-LD2026-09-27+126 −69counted
bb64179NexusAIfeat: Curitiba image knowledge base for Dossier character consistency2026-09-27+277 −8counted
0407096NexusAIfeat: Curitiba image knowledge base for Dossier character consistency2026-09-27+277 −8counted
d9cf693coxa-hubfix: block form-field-leak descriptions at scrape time2026-09-27+544 −5counted
449af89coxa-hubMerge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master'2026-09-27+594 −44counted
adeba86coxa-hubfeat: gate admin HTML shell behind httpOnly session cookie2026-09-27+291 −7counted
804ceddcoxa_crmAdd a passwordless page where applicants can check application status.2026-09-26+1,155 −0counted
36f9875NexusAIfix: ScriptPatch was silently dropping full_script edits2026-09-26+9 −1counted
39c75edNexusAIfeat(dossier): list finished episode videos in the Output tab2026-09-26+82 −12counted
cc3c31fNexusAIfix: ScriptPatch was silently dropping full_script edits2026-09-26+9 −1counted
9701799NexusAIfeat: add Dossier (Avatorio animated series) page to dashboard2026-09-26+1,681 −0counted
a5b4114coxa-hubfeat: Brandfetch logo auto-fetch as fallback tier before sector plac…2026-09-26+198 −8counted
f5ed6becoxa-hubfeat: owner photo-nudge — confirmation emails on all verify paths + 5…2026-09-26+484 −7counted
90dae53coxa-hubfeat: sector-based placeholder images for listings with no logo2026-09-26+324 −57counted
8c25252coxa_crmSend outreach mail via Microsoft Graph instead of Resend.2026-09-26+196 −52counted
6142d75coxa-hubfix: unauthenticated review CTA now links to /login instead of claim …2026-09-26+2 −1counted
7653474coxa-hubfeat: LLM-generated review insights (summary/strengths/weaknesses)2026-09-26+460 −6counted
e2e6132coxa_crmKeep track pages static by reading search on the client.2026-09-26+42 −10counted
b266441coxa-hubMerge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master'2026-09-25+1,980 −548counted
aa7f3a6coxa_crmCache published news so static program pages can render.2026-09-25+1 −1counted
db88753coxa-hubfix: neighborhood hub matching, empresas pagination, claim flow order,2026-09-25+4,787 −186counted
abdc499NexusAIfeat: add Dossier Studio -- standalone UI for the Dossier animated-se…2026-09-25+1,425 −0counted
ee72016NexusAIfeat: add Dossier Studio -- standalone UI for the Dossier animated-se…2026-09-25+1,425 −0counted
77f419bNexusAIMerge branch 'main' of https://github.com/1Touch-dev/NexusAI2026-09-25+8,938 −2,380counted
42b241cNexusAIfeat: wire Brand Profile into Dossier + cross-job character image con…2026-09-25+153 −15counted
814e813NexusAIfeat: wire Brand Profile into Dossier + cross-job character image con…2026-09-25+153 −15counted
fe0ece9coxa_crmAlign filled buttons and the policy banner with the Coritiba tokens.2026-09-24+22 −22counted
6f4af6ccoxa-hubfeat: Twenty CRM background sync via BullMQ queue2026-09-23+1,061 −60counted
ffa2e21Pr_Distribution_CRMAdd PR Distribution CRM: 8 objects, 18 relation fields, IndexNow adap…2026-09-23+1,077 −529counted
694312bcoxa_crmKeep e2e write mocks off App Router flights.2026-09-23+70 −62counted
7af0986coxa_crmRebrand the public site to the approved palette, type, and logo.2026-09-23+445 −214counted
7375cebPr_Distribution_CRMInitial commit from Create Twenty App2026-09-23+4,625 −0counted
d96684ccoxa-hubGate Places review fetch the same way as adapter ingest.2026-09-23+104 −66counted

This is wrong

Anything on this page can be disputed. A correction is a stored row, not an email — it stays attached to the figure it challenges.

There is no authentication in this POC, so the submitter is self-declared. Before this platform is used for anything that affects pay, this field has to come from a real session.

Corrections on record · 0

Open disputes are shown to anyone reading this person's numbers.

Nothing disputed yet.