Hours tracked
0.8
1 days tracked
Hours per day
0.8
on days with tracked time
Mean activity
33.0%
never scored
PRs opened
0
in this period
PRs merged
0
none opened
Median time to merge
—
nothing merged
Commits
1
1 repositories
Lines changed
4
context only — never scored
Identity
A person is only measurable across the providers they are linked to.
Evidence confidence for this person
0.55 against a 0.60 floor — no composite score is computed and no alert can fire for this person (AC-05). Measured 0.70, capped because no task tracker defines the work.
Delivery signal
An input to a conversation, not a verdict.
79
rank 3 of 4
Why this reads as “Steady”
The band is cut from this period's own distribution, not a fixed threshold. The arithmetic is below so it can be checked rather than believed.
79 of 100, ranked 3 of 4 people with a score, against a cohort median of 79. The bands are cut from this period's own distribution, not fixed thresholds: ≤ 79 is behind, ≥ 83 is leading, and this person is in the middle 40% of people with a score this period. With every component at the cohort median this person would score 92; they score 79. That difference is carried by infrastructure (38 against a cohort median of 100, worth -13.3 points). 2 of 6 components (completed work, review) could not be measured at all, so the remaining weights were rescaled — this score rests on 70% of the intended evidence.
A band compares this person to the 4 people who have a score in this window — nothing more. It is not a rating, it does not persist, and it moves when the cohort or the window moves.
How this number was built
Every term is shown with the rows it came from and the cohort figure it was judged against. If a term looks wrong, the tables below are the argument.
| Component | Weight | Score | Cohort median | Effect | Computed from |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infrastructure | 15% | 38 | 100 | -13.3 | 327 points from 138 AWS changes on 9 days |
| Change discipline | 18% | 100 | 100 | 0 | median commit 168 lines |
| Consistency | 12% | 57 | 56 | +0.2 | code landed on 30 separate days |
| Craft | 25% | 99 | 98 | +0.4 | 223 of 224 commits name what they changed |
| Completed work | 22% | — | — | — | not scored — never assigned a task in any connected tracker. Scoring 0 here would read as "delivered nothing" when the truth is that no tracker describes this person’s work. |
| Review | 8% | — | — | — | not scored — no review is recorded anywhere in the organisation, so this term has no data for anyone. It is withheld rather than scored 0 — a 0 would read as "does not collaborate". |
Effect is a counterfactual, not a share: how many points this person’s score would move if that one component dropped to the cohort median for it. The effects sum to 79 − 92 = -13, where 92 is what this person would score with every one of their components at the cohort median. Negative rows are the reason the total sits where it does. A component with no data is withheld and the remaining weights are rescaled — it is never scored as zero, and it never counts against anyone.
Measured but deliberately not scored: 0.8 hours tracked, 1 commits, 4 lines changed, 32.8% activity. The first four measure motion rather than delivery and are trivially inflated. CI is excluded because it exists on a minority of repositories, so scoring it would rank people by which repository they work in. This score cannot see architecture, planning, mentoring, incident response or infrastructure work at all.
Employee KPIs
Six of the twelve. Where a value is absent the reason is stated — never rendered as a zero.
Focused project ratio
conf 0.900%
All 0.82h went to Hubstaff projects that are not mapped to any repository or external key. This is a project-mapping metric, not a diligence metric — it measures our configuration, not this person's focus.
Evidence confidence
conf 1.0055%
Below the 0.6 floor, so no composite score is computed and no alert can fire (AC-05).
| Accepted difficulty points | blocked | None of this person's 3 work units reached acceptance (merged + first CI green + ≥1 review). |
| First-pass acceptance | blocked | Nothing accepted, so there is no first-pass rate. |
| Idle classification mix | blocked | 0 of 5 intervals carry a class. |
| Tokens per accepted point | blocked | No AI usage data connected. |
Day by day
Tracked time beside code that landed. Click a day for the raw Hubstaff intervals behind its hours.
| Day | Hours | Act% | Commits | PRs opened | PRs merged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▾ 2026-09-28 | 0.82 | 32.8 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Raw Hubstaff intervals · 2026-09-28
| Start | End | Act% | Project | Source | Provider row |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04:10 | 04:20 | 48.06 | Position | hubstaff | hubstaff:10306941171 |
| 04:20 | 04:30 | 21.50 | Position | hubstaff | hubstaff:10306960919 |
| 04:30 | 04:40 | 48.50 | Position | hubstaff | hubstaff:10306983148 |
| 04:40 | 04:50 | 32.33 | Position | hubstaff | hubstaff:10307006408 |
| 04:50 | 05:00 | 14.67 | Position | hubstaff | hubstaff:10307034166 |
5 rows from time_intervals. This is the bottom of the chain — there is nothing below it but the Hubstaff API response.
Where the time went
Hubstaff project attribution.
| Position | 0.8h | 5 rows |
What was not counted
Commits excluded from output, with the reason stored on the row.
Nothing of this person's was excluded in this window.
Pull requests · 0
The rows behind “merged” and “reviewed before merge”. Every one links to GitHub.
No pull requests opened or merged by this person in this window.
Commits · 1 counted, 0 excluded
Default-branch history only. Work on unmerged PR branches does not appear here — see the pull requests above.
| SHA | Repo | Message | When | +/− | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a9970db | POSITION_INTELLIGENCE | ci: run pytest workflow on pushes to feature/squadB | 2026-09-28 | +3 −1 | counted |
This is wrong
Anything on this page can be disputed. A correction is a stored row, not an email — it stays attached to the figure it challenges.
Corrections on record · 0
Open disputes are shown to anyone reading this person's numbers.
Nothing disputed yet.