E

EmpCloud

conf 0.55

Thunder Marketing · 1Touch-dev

Pankaj Kumar

pankaj@kyma.world

2026-09-19 → 2026-09-26 · showing up to 2026-09-26 · live data last updated 26 Sept, 12:18 UTC

Hours tracked

55.9

7 days tracked

Hours per day

8

on days with tracked time

Mean activity

26.7%

never scored

PRs opened

0

in this period

PRs merged

0

none opened

Median time to merge

—

nothing merged

Commits

4

2 repositories

Lines changed

96

context only — never scored

Identity

A person is only measurable across the providers they are linked to.

aws pankajaws Pankaj-Sgithub pankaj1touchhubstaff Pankaj Kumar

Evidence confidence for this person

0.00floor 0.601.00

0.55 against a 0.60 floor — no composite score is computed and no alert can fire for this person (AC-05). Measured 0.70, capped because no task tracker defines the work.

Delivery signal

An input to a conversation, not a verdict.

Steady

83

rank 2 of 12

behind ≤ 78median 7881 ≤ leading
change discipline 18%70
craft 25%92
consistency 12%60
infrastructure 15%100
completed work 22%—
review 8%—

Why this reads as “Steady”

The band is cut from this period's own distribution, not a fixed threshold. The arithmetic is below so it can be checked rather than believed.

83 of 100, ranked 2 of 12 people with a score, against a cohort median of 78. The bands are cut from this period's own distribution, not fixed thresholds: ≤ 78 is behind, ≥ 81 is leading, and this person is in the middle 40% of people with a score this period. With every component at the cohort median this person would score 82; they score 83. That difference is carried by change discipline (70 against a cohort median of 100, worth -7.7 points) and craft (92 against a cohort median of 98, worth -2.1 points). 2 of 6 components (completed work, review) could not be measured at all, so the remaining weights were rescaled — this score rests on 70% of the intended evidence.

A band compares this person to the 12 people who have a score in this window — nothing more. It is not a rating, it does not persist, and it moves when the cohort or the window moves.

How this number was built

Every term is shown with the rows it came from and the cohort figure it was judged against. If a term looks wrong, the tables below are the argument.

ComponentWeightScoreCohort medianEffectComputed from
Change discipline18%70100-7.7median commit 628 lines
Craft25%9298-2.1167 of 183 commits name what they changed
Consistency12%6055+0.9code landed on 29 separate days
Infrastructure15%10053+10.16282 points from 1863 AWS changes on 33 days
Completed work22%———not scored — never assigned a task in any connected tracker. Scoring 0 here would read as "delivered nothing" when the truth is that no tracker describes this person’s work.
Review8%———not scored — no review is recorded anywhere in the organisation, so this term has no data for anyone. It is withheld rather than scored 0 — a 0 would read as "does not collaborate".

Effect is a counterfactual, not a share: how many points this person’s score would move if that one component dropped to the cohort median for it. The effects sum to 83 − 82 = 1, where 82 is what this person would score with every one of their components at the cohort median. Negative rows are the reason the total sits where it does. A component with no data is withheld and the remaining weights are rescaled — it is never scored as zero, and it never counts against anyone.

Measured but deliberately not scored: 55.9 hours tracked, 4 commits, 96 lines changed, 25.5% activity. The first four measure motion rather than delivery and are trivially inflated. CI is excluded because it exists on a minority of repositories, so scoring it would rank people by which repository they work in. This score cannot see architecture, planning, mentoring, incident response or infrastructure work at all.

Infrastructure work

From CloudTrail — the only record of work that leaves no trace in git.

Weighted points

2816

Changes

875

Days

8

Unscored

7

sign-ins, own MFA, shells

Provisioning 270 × 5ptDeployment 50 × 4ptAccess & security 156 × 3ptConfiguration 399 × 2pt

What they actually did

  • route53 ChangeResourceRecordSets×393 · 786 pts
  • amplify CreateApp×86 · 430 pts
  • amplify CreateDomainAssociation×51 · 255 pts
  • amplify DeleteDomainAssociation×46 · 230 pts
  • route53 CreateHostedZone×42 · 210 pts
  • amplify CreateBranch×41 · 205 pts
  • amplify StartJob×45 · 180 pts
  • iam AttachRolePolicy×52 · 156 pts

CloudTrail records the API call, not the intent. It cannot tell a considered change from one corrected a minute later, and it retains 90 days — so an empty earlier period means “not retained”, never “nothing happened”.

Employee KPIs

Six of the twelve. Where a value is absent the reason is stated — never rendered as a zero.

Focused project ratio

conf 0.90

19.2%

10.71h of 55.91h on mapped projects. A project-mapping metric, not a diligence metric.

Evidence confidence

conf 1.00

55%

Below the 0.6 floor, so no composite score is computed and no alert can fire (AC-05).

Accepted difficulty pointsblockedNone of this person's 6 work units reached acceptance (merged + first CI green + ≥1 review).
First-pass acceptanceblockedNothing accepted, so there is no first-pass rate.
Idle classification mixblocked0 of 366 intervals carry a class.
Tokens per accepted pointblockedNo AI usage data connected.

Day by day

Tracked time beside code that landed. Click a day for the raw Hubstaff intervals behind its hours.

DayHoursAct%CommitsPRs openedPRs merged
▸ 2026-09-262.9818.3000
▸ 2026-09-257.7321.3000
▸ 2026-09-248.4529.8000
▸ 2026-09-239.1528.5000
▸ 2026-09-229.5732.4000
▸ 2026-09-2110.5621.9400
▾ 2026-09-200.00—000
▸ 2026-09-197.4720.4000

Raw Hubstaff intervals · 2026-09-20

No intervals stored for this day. That is an absence of tracked time, not a claim that no work happened.

Where the time went

Hubstaff project attribution.

Thunder Marketing's Project45.2h294 rows
CMS10.7h72 rows

What was not counted

Commits excluded from output, with the reason stored on the row.

Nothing of this person's was excluded in this window.

Pull requests · 0

The rows behind “merged” and “reviewed before merge”. Every one links to GitHub.

No pull requests opened or merged by this person in this window.

Commits · 4 counted, 0 excluded

Default-branch history only. Work on unmerged PR branches does not appear here — see the pull requests above.

SHARepoMessageWhen+/−Counted
82db370Business-Directory-for-Coritibanoop: touch server.ts to create branch divergence2026-09-21+0 −0counted
96b75ddBusiness-Directory-for-Coritibachore: initialize main branch2026-09-21+0 −47counted
635ea88Business-Directory-for-Coritibachore: empty base for main branch2026-09-21+1 −48counted
2ecfa64globla-cms-IndonesianMerge pull request #4 from 1Touch-dev/1touch/CMSA-72026-09-21+0 −0counted

This is wrong

Anything on this page can be disputed. A correction is a stored row, not an email — it stays attached to the figure it challenges.

There is no authentication in this POC, so the submitter is self-declared. Before this platform is used for anything that affects pay, this field has to come from a real session.

Corrections on record · 0

Open disputes are shown to anyone reading this person's numbers.

Nothing disputed yet.