Hours tracked
37.3
5 days tracked
Hours per day
7.5
on days with tracked time
Mean activity
50.6%
never scored
PRs opened
0
in this period
PRs merged
0
none opened
Median time to merge
—
nothing merged
Commits
10
2 repositories
Lines changed
7,538
context only — never scored
Identity
A person is only measurable across the providers they are linked to.
Evidence confidence for this person
0.40 against a 0.60 floor — no composite score is computed and no alert can fire for this person (AC-05).
Delivery signal
An input to a conversation, not a verdict.
63
rank 11 of 12
Why this reads as “Steady”
The band is cut from this period's own distribution, not a fixed threshold. The arithmetic is below so it can be checked rather than believed.
63 of 100, ranked 11 of 12 people with a score, against a cohort median of 78. The bands are cut from this period's own distribution, not fixed thresholds: ≤ 78 is behind, ≥ 81 is leading, and this person is in the middle 40% of people with a score this period. With every component at the cohort median this person would score 82; they score 63. That difference is carried by infrastructure (13 against a cohort median of 53, worth -8.6 points) and change discipline (73 against a cohort median of 100, worth -6.9 points). 2 of 6 components (completed work, review) could not be measured at all, so the remaining weights were rescaled — this score rests on 70% of the intended evidence.
A band compares this person to the 12 people who have a score in this window — nothing more. It is not a rating, it does not persist, and it moves when the cohort or the window moves.
How this number was built
Every term is shown with the rows it came from and the cohort figure it was judged against. If a term looks wrong, the tables below are the argument.
| Component | Weight | Score | Cohort median | Effect | Computed from |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infrastructure | 15% | 13 | 53 | -8.6 | 45 points from 21 AWS changes on 8 days |
| Change discipline | 18% | 73 | 100 | -6.9 | median commit 637 lines |
| Craft | 25% | 90 | 98 | -2.9 | 82 of 93 commits name what they changed |
| Consistency | 12% | 55 | 55 | 0 | code landed on 24 separate days |
| Completed work | 22% | — | — | — | not scored — never assigned a task in any connected tracker. Scoring 0 here would read as "delivered nothing" when the truth is that no tracker describes this person’s work. |
| Review | 8% | — | — | — | not scored — no review is recorded anywhere in the organisation, so this term has no data for anyone. It is withheld rather than scored 0 — a 0 would read as "does not collaborate". |
Effect is a counterfactual, not a share: how many points this person’s score would move if that one component dropped to the cohort median for it. The effects sum to 63 − 82 = -19, where 82 is what this person would score with every one of their components at the cohort median. Negative rows are the reason the total sits where it does. A component with no data is withheld and the remaining weights are rescaled — it is never scored as zero, and it never counts against anyone.
Measured but deliberately not scored: 37.3 hours tracked, 10 commits, 7,538 lines changed, 47.3% activity. The first four measure motion rather than delivery and are trivially inflated. CI is excluded because it exists on a minority of repositories, so scoring it would rank people by which repository they work in. This score cannot see architecture, planning, mentoring, incident response or infrastructure work at all.
Infrastructure work
From CloudTrail — the only record of work that leaves no trace in git.
Weighted points
13
Changes
5
Days
3
Unscored
0
sign-ins, own MFA, shells
What they actually did
- ec2 StartInstances×3 · 6 pts
- s3 CreateBucket×1 · 5 pts
- s3 PutBucketEncryption×1 · 2 pts
CloudTrail records the API call, not the intent. It cannot tell a considered change from one corrected a minute later, and it retains 90 days — so an empty earlier period means “not retained”, never “nothing happened”.
Employee KPIs
Six of the twelve. Where a value is absent the reason is stated — never rendered as a zero.
Focused project ratio
conf 0.900%
All 37.29h went to Hubstaff projects that are not mapped to any repository or external key. This is a project-mapping metric, not a diligence metric — it measures our configuration, not this person's focus.
Evidence confidence
conf 1.0040%
Below the 0.6 floor, so no composite score is computed and no alert can fire (AC-05).
| Accepted difficulty points | blocked | None of this person's 0 work units reached acceptance (merged + first CI green + ≥1 review). |
| First-pass acceptance | blocked | Nothing accepted, so there is no first-pass rate. |
| Idle classification mix | blocked | 0 of 277 intervals carry a class. |
| Tokens per accepted point | blocked | No AI usage data connected. |
Day by day
Tracked time beside code that landed. Click a day for the raw Hubstaff intervals behind its hours.
| Day | Hours | Act% | Commits | PRs opened | PRs merged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ 2026-09-26 | 3.04 | 40.9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ▸ 2026-09-25 | 0.00 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ▸ 2026-09-24 | 8.75 | 56.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ▸ 2026-09-23 | 8.88 | 54.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ▸ 2026-09-22 | 8.07 | 44.8 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| ▸ 2026-09-21 | 8.56 | 35.5 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| ▸ 2026-09-20 | 0.00 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ▸ 2026-09-19 | 0.00 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Where the time went
Hubstaff project attribution.
| Thunder Marketing's Project | 29.4h | 214 rows |
| Position | 7.3h | 57 rows |
| Football_Scraping_Main | 0.5h | 6 rows |
What was not counted
Commits excluded from output, with the reason stored on the row.
Nothing of this person's was excluded in this window.
Pull requests · 0
The rows behind “merged” and “reviewed before merge”. Every one links to GitHub.
No pull requests opened or merged by this person in this window.
Commits · 10 counted, 0 excluded
Default-branch history only. Work on unmerged PR branches does not appear here — see the pull requests above.
| SHA | Repo | Message | When | +/− | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2152caf | POSITION_INTELLIGENCE | Implement hardened collector source quality and proxy handling | 2026-09-22 | +794 −48 | counted |
| ca5ca51 | cms | Debug the mongo cache and football api error | 2026-09-22 | +660 −22 | counted |
| 4dc154c | cms | fix: implement queue-based MongoDB slot system to resolve MONGO_POOL_… | 2026-09-22 | +907 −25 | counted |
| da5b2dd | cms | Update cacheQueryGuards.ts | 2026-09-22 | +1 −1 | counted |
| 60ff02c | cms | Fix Football cache capped at 8 concurrent Mongo reads GSC no longer r… | 2026-09-22 | +86 −18 | counted |
| 172c6b2 | cms | fix cache mongo wait error | 2026-09-22 | +250 −70 | counted |
| 6a4ca9c | POSITION_INTELLIGENCE | Remove legacy PostgreSQL collection runtime | 2026-09-21 | +104 −3,172 | counted |
| d7e4ea7 | POSITION_INTELLIGENCE | Harden collection source quality and document architecture | 2026-09-21 | +1,069 −46 | counted |
| 6da49e8 | cms | Update automationStateManager.ts | 2026-09-21 | +1 −0 | counted |
| 9f6a9b7 | cms | Fix the automation cron issue | 2026-09-21 | +218 −46 | counted |
This is wrong
Anything on this page can be disputed. A correction is a stored row, not an email — it stays attached to the figure it challenges.
Corrections on record · 0
Open disputes are shown to anyone reading this person's numbers.
Nothing disputed yet.