E

EmpCloud

conf 0.55

Thunder Marketing · 1Touch-dev

Pranav Ojha

pranav@kyma.world

2026-09-19 → 2026-09-26 · showing up to 2026-09-26 · live data last updated 26 Sept, 12:18 UTC

Hours tracked

16.6

2 days tracked

Hours per day

8.3

on days with tracked time

Mean activity

34.3%

never scored

PRs opened

0

in this period

PRs merged

0

none opened

Median time to merge

—

nothing merged

Commits

16

10 repositories

Lines changed

26,511

context only — never scored

Identity

A person is only measurable across the providers they are linked to.

aws 2:Pranav-Ogithub Pranav173261hubstaff Pranav Ojha

Evidence confidence for this person

0.00floor 0.601.00

0.40 against a 0.60 floor — no composite score is computed and no alert can fire for this person (AC-05).

Delivery signal

An input to a conversation, not a verdict.

Steady

62

rank 12 of 12

behind ≤ 78median 7881 ≤ leading
craft 25%46
consistency 12%39
change discipline 18%100
completed work 22%—
infrastructure 15%—
review 8%—

Why this reads as “Steady”

The band is cut from this period's own distribution, not a fixed threshold. The arithmetic is below so it can be checked rather than believed.

62 of 100, ranked 12 of 12 people with a score, against a cohort median of 78. The bands are cut from this period's own distribution, not fixed thresholds: ≤ 78 is behind, ≥ 81 is leading, and this person is in the middle 40% of people with a score this period. With every component at the cohort median this person would score 89; they score 62. That difference is carried by craft (46 against a cohort median of 98, worth -23.6 points) and consistency (39 against a cohort median of 55, worth -3.5 points). 3 of 6 components (completed work, infrastructure, review) could not be measured at all, so the remaining weights were rescaled — this score rests on 55% of the intended evidence.

A band compares this person to the 12 people who have a score in this window — nothing more. It is not a rating, it does not persist, and it moves when the cohort or the window moves.

How this number was built

Every term is shown with the rows it came from and the cohort figure it was judged against. If a term looks wrong, the tables below are the argument.

ComponentWeightScoreCohort medianEffectComputed from
Craft25%4698-23.642 of 118 commits name what they changed
Consistency12%3955-3.5code landed on 12 separate days
Change discipline18%1001000median commit 114 lines
Completed work22%———not scored — never assigned a task in any connected tracker. Scoring 0 here would read as "delivered nothing" when the truth is that no tracker describes this person’s work.
Infrastructure15%—53—not scored — has an AWS account but made no infrastructure changes in the window. Not scored as zero: console access is not a job description, and someone whose work is code has not failed at ops.
Review8%———not scored — no review is recorded anywhere in the organisation, so this term has no data for anyone. It is withheld rather than scored 0 — a 0 would read as "does not collaborate".

Effect is a counterfactual, not a share: how many points this person’s score would move if that one component dropped to the cohort median for it. The effects sum to 62 − 89 = -27, where 89 is what this person would score with every one of their components at the cohort median. Negative rows are the reason the total sits where it does. A component with no data is withheld and the remaining weights are rescaled — it is never scored as zero, and it never counts against anyone.

Measured but deliberately not scored: 16.6 hours tracked, 16 commits, 26,511 lines changed, 35.1% activity. The first four measure motion rather than delivery and are trivially inflated. CI is excluded because it exists on a minority of repositories, so scoring it would rank people by which repository they work in. This score cannot see architecture, planning, mentoring, incident response or infrastructure work at all.

Infrastructure work

From CloudTrail — the only record of work that leaves no trace in git.

Weighted points

0

Changes

0

Days

1

Unscored

2

sign-ins, own MFA, shells

What they actually did

    CloudTrail records the API call, not the intent. It cannot tell a considered change from one corrected a minute later, and it retains 90 days — so an empty earlier period means “not retained”, never “nothing happened”.

    Employee KPIs

    Six of the twelve. Where a value is absent the reason is stated — never rendered as a zero.

    Focused project ratio

    conf 0.90

    0%

    All 16.56h went to Hubstaff projects that are not mapped to any repository or external key. This is a project-mapping metric, not a diligence metric — it measures our configuration, not this person's focus.

    Evidence confidence

    conf 1.00

    40%

    Below the 0.6 floor, so no composite score is computed and no alert can fire (AC-05).

    Accepted difficulty pointsblockedNone of this person's 0 work units reached acceptance (merged + first CI green + ≥1 review).
    First-pass acceptanceblockedNothing accepted, so there is no first-pass rate.
    Idle classification mixblocked0 of 124 intervals carry a class.
    Tokens per accepted pointblockedNo AI usage data connected.

    Day by day

    Tracked time beside code that landed. Click a day for the raw Hubstaff intervals behind its hours.

    DayHoursAct%CommitsPRs openedPRs merged
    ▸ 2026-09-260.00—000
    ▸ 2026-09-250.00—000
    ▾ 2026-09-240.00—000
    ▸ 2026-09-235.9030.1000
    ▸ 2026-09-2210.6637.81600
    ▸ 2026-09-210.00—000
    ▸ 2026-09-200.00—000
    ▸ 2026-09-190.00—000

    Raw Hubstaff intervals · 2026-09-24

    No intervals stored for this day. That is an absence of tracked time, not a claim that no work happened.

    Where the time went

    Hubstaff project attribution.

    Thunder Marketing's Project16.6h124 rows

    What was not counted

    Commits excluded from output, with the reason stored on the row.

    Nothing of this person's was excluded in this window.

    Pull requests · 0

    The rows behind “merged” and “reviewed before merge”. Every one links to GitHub.

    No pull requests opened or merged by this person in this window.

    Commits · 16 counted, 0 excluded

    Default-branch history only. Work on unmerged PR branches does not appear here — see the pull requests above.

    SHARepoMessageWhen+/−Counted
    8640895global-cms-Russianlockfile and package file updated2026-09-22+31 −0counted
    ec1dc77global-cms-RussianSync the lockfile2026-09-22+105 −20counted
    3bf027cglobal-cms-Russianresolved build error2026-09-22+62 −26counted
    8e3e850global-cms-ThaiTranslation correction, SEO enhancement, Layout enhancement2026-09-22+249 −261counted
    1b3e9f3global-cms-telguMerge branch 'main' of https://github.com/1Touch-dev/global-cms-telgu2026-09-22+942 −5counted
    2edc5c4global-cms-telguSEO enhancement, Translation correction, removal of world cup data2026-09-22+508 −186counted
    5c00e00global-cms-RussianMerge branch 'main' of https://github.com/1Touch-dev/global-cms-Russian2026-09-22+1,591 −1,453counted
    d5f7f24global-cms-RussianSEO enhancement2026-09-22+253 −33counted
    184d290global-cms-Portugu-sRebuild news, SEO enhancement, layout enhancement2026-09-22+1,663 −1,259counted
    1fd8b76global-cms-PolishLocal sports integration, translation correction, SEO enhancement, la…2026-09-22+1,628 −439counted
    fba9fb9global-cms-hindiTranslation correction, layout correction, SEO enhancement2026-09-22+2,930 −4,567counted
    77d2f79global-cms-GermanFixed translation, Layout enhancement, corrected route and SEO enhanc…2026-09-22+778 −290counted
    4d33ef1global-cms-frenchFixed translation and SEO enhancement2026-09-22+785 −596counted
    711e779global-cms-FilipinoLocal Sports integration and SEO enhancement2026-09-22+1,496 −543counted
    a60bba9global-cms-arabicMerge branch 'main' of https://github.com/1Touch-dev/global-cms-arabic2026-09-22+1,132 −32counted
    9835a0aglobal-cms-arabicSEO enhancement2026-09-22+1,055 −1,593counted

    This is wrong

    Anything on this page can be disputed. A correction is a stored row, not an email — it stays attached to the figure it challenges.

    There is no authentication in this POC, so the submitter is self-declared. Before this platform is used for anything that affects pay, this field has to come from a real session.

    Corrections on record · 0

    Open disputes are shown to anyone reading this person's numbers.

    Nothing disputed yet.