Rishav Raj

78 of 100, ranked 9 of 12 people with a score, against a cohort median of 78. The bands are cut from this period's own distribution, not fixed thresholds: ≤ 78 is behind, ≥ 81 is leading, and this person is in the middle 40% of people with a score this period. With every component at the cohort median this person would score 89; they score 78. That difference is carried by change discipline (80 against a cohort median of 100, worth -6.5 points) and consistency (32 against a cohort median of 55, worth -5 points). 3 of 6 components (completed work, infrastructure, review) could not be measured at all, so the remaining weights were rescaled — this score rests on 55% of the intended evidence.

A band compares this person to the 12 people who have a score in this window — nothing more. It is not a rating, it does not persist, and it moves when the cohort or the window moves.

Effect is a counterfactual, not a share: how many points this person’s score would move if that one component dropped to the cohort median for it. The effects sum to 78 − 89 = -11, where 89 is what this person would score with every one of their components at the cohort median. Negative rows are the reason the total sits where it does. A component with no data is withheld and the remaining weights are rescaled — it is never scored as zero, and it never counts against anyone.

Measured but deliberately not scored: 46.6 hours tracked, 1 commits, 4,818 lines changed, 49.1% activity. The first four measure motion rather than delivery and are trivially inflated. CI is excluded because it exists on a minority of repositories, so scoring it would rank people by which repository they work in. This score cannot see architecture, planning, mentoring, incident response or infrastructure work at all.

• ⚑ Median commit is 4,527 lines

  Rule: fires above a 3,000-line median commit — measured 4,527 lines across 8 commits.

  What it does not mean: A median this size is usually a lock file, a vendored dependency, generated client code or a migration — committed, but not authored line by line. It is a reason to discount the volume, not evidence of anything about the author.

No pull requests opened or merged by this person in this window.