E

EmpCloud

conf 0.55

Thunder Marketing · 1Touch-dev

Team

23 people · 14 produced code · 3174h tracked

2026-08-27 → 2026-09-26 · showing up to 2026-09-26 · live data last updated 26 Sept, 08:33 UTC

People

23

with tracked time or code

Producing code

14

rankable cohort

Tracked time but no code

0

a question, not a verdict

No code account linked

5

no signal at all — never a low one

Not ranked on code

0

role is not code delivery

Roster

Sorted by signal. Click any name for the evidence behind their number.

#PersonSignalSeenComponentsHoursDaysAct%PRsMergedCommitsLinesStatus
1Ankur Kumar
ankur1touch
7687%
change discipline100
review15
consistency56
craft100
infrastructure54
completed work—
252.53123.40011684,212Leading
2Aziz Bohra
AzizBohraKyma
76100%
infrastructure36
change discipline100
consistency56
craft99
review50
completed work—
222.32431.900223258,527Leading
3MOHD NAVED
MohdNaved123
7652%
change discipline89
consistency50
review15
craft99
completed work—
infrastructure—
201.52522.60035787,918Leading

⚑ 2 flags

4Pankaj Kumar
pankaj1touch
76100%
change discipline70
craft92
review15
consistency62
infrastructure100
completed work—
194.222250073120,198Leading
5Pramod Soni
PRAMODS0NI
7540%
consistency28
change discipline100
review15
craft99
completed work—
infrastructure—
121.21530.5003017,283Leading
6Abhishek Kulkarni
Abhishek9302
7479%
consistency51
change discipline100
infrastructure50
review15
craft99
completed work—
170.41926.20014294,447Steady
7Anshuman Parmar
anshumankyma
7380%
change discipline93
craft98
consistency55
review15
infrastructure53
completed work—
177.025360087146,067Steady
8Harsh Patel
harsh-kyma
73100%
craft63
change discipline100
review15
consistency58
infrastructure100
completed work—
171.12223.40010882,663Steady
9Manish Chandrakar
manishKyma
7076%
change discipline69
craft93
review15
consistency63
completed work—
infrastructure—
179.62518.600131235,080Steady
10Akash Kumar
AkashKyma
6768%
infrastructure16
consistency49
change discipline100
review15
craft99
completed work—
185.22219.600711,002,805Behind

⚑ 2 flags

11Dhiraj Ambekar
Dhiraj4113
6781%
infrastructure35
craft90
consistency46
change discipline100
review15
completed work—
162.62125.3004037,075Behind
12Jitu Prosad Saha
jitusaha11
6255%
infrastructure12
craft88
consistency46
change discipline100
review15
completed work—
172.32027004866,791Behind

⚑ 1 flag

13Rushikesh Powar
rushikesh-swe
5890%
infrastructure13
change discipline73
craft90
review15
consistency56
completed work—
165.72041.3006094,052Behind
14Pranav Ojha
Pranav173261
5637%
craft46
consistency40
change discipline100
review15
completed work—
infrastructure—
139.31933.10043117,497Behind
·Rishav Raj
rishav1238
—23%too little data to rank in this period199.12641.500632,646Unrankable

⚑ 2 flags

·mohammad saad
not linked
—0%identity unmapped173.52422————Unlinked

⚑ 1 flag

·Rushendra Varma Mudunuru
not linked
—83%identity unmapped153.4249.1————Unlinked

⚑ 1 flag

·Anmol Music
not linked
—0%identity unmapped115.41825.9————Unlinked

⚑ 1 flag

·Srija Bandapally
not linked
—0%identity unmapped16.1327.6————Unlinked

⚑ 1 flag

·Srija Bandapally
not linked
—0%identity unmapped1.4220.2————Unlinked

⚑ 1 flag

·Claude Code
claude
—100%no code in this period0.00—00144Outside cohort
·Cursor Agent
cursor-agent
—100%no code in this period0.00—006896Outside cohort
·Ruhani Allagh
not linked
——no code in this period0.00—————Outside cohort

Only people with a published score carry a rank. A dot means this period cannot place them — not that they placed last.

How to read this table

Three sentences that separate a fair dashboard from a harmful one.

  • A dash is not a zero. 5 people have no code account linked. They get no signal at all — printing 0 would assert they produced nothing.
  • “No code” is a question. 0 tracked time and landed nothing in these repos. The work may not be code, or may live where this platform cannot see.
  • Seen is the share of someone’s known working days that produced a commit, review, task or infrastructure change. It never changes a score — it says what the score is about. Below 35% the comparative band is withheld entirely: calling someone “behind” on a fifth of the evidence is a verdict this data cannot support.

    Hours and lines are never scored. They are shown for context.