E

EmpCloud

conf 0.55

Thunder Marketing · 1Touch-dev

Team

24 people · 14 produced code · 3097h tracked

2026-08-28 → 2026-09-27 · showing up to 2026-09-27 · live data last updated 27 Sept, 05:01 UTC

People

24

with tracked time or code

Producing code

14

rankable cohort

Tracked time but no code

0

a question, not a verdict

No code account linked

6

no signal at all — never a low one

Not ranked on code

0

role is not code delivery

Roster

Sorted by signal. Click any name for the evidence behind their number.

#PersonSignalSeenComponentsHoursDaysAct%PRsMergedCommitsLinesStatus
1Ankur Kumar
ankur1touch
7784%
change discipline100
review15
consistency58
craft100
infrastructure58
completed work—
248.73123.50010776,812Steady
2Pankaj Kumar
pankaj1touch
77100%
change discipline72
craft94
review15
consistency62
infrastructure100
completed work—
204.42324.50073120,198Steady
3Aziz Bohra
AzizBohraKyma
7696%
infrastructure38
change discipline100
craft99
consistency58
review50
completed work—
214.72432.200221255,395Steady
4MOHD NAVED
MohdNaved123
7654%
change discipline88
consistency50
review15
craft99
completed work—
infrastructure—
191.32423.30035787,918Steady

⚑ 2 flags

5Pramod Soni
PRAMODS0NI
7540%
consistency29
change discipline100
review15
craft99
completed work—
infrastructure—
121.21530.5003017,283Steady
6Anshuman Parmar
anshumankyma
7479%
change discipline94
craft98
consistency55
review15
infrastructure56
completed work—
173.124360080141,371Steady
7Harsh Patel
harsh-kyma
74100%
craft65
change discipline100
review15
consistency59
infrastructure100
completed work—
163.22224.30010577,947Steady
8Abhishek Kulkarni
Abhishek9302
7478%
consistency51
change discipline100
infrastructure50
review15
craft99
completed work—
161.71826.30011472,000Steady
9Manish Chandrakar
manishKyma
7175%
change discipline70
craft93
review15
consistency63
completed work—
infrastructure—
170.72418.700125225,986Steady
10Dhiraj Ambekar
Dhiraj4113
6880%
infrastructure35
craft90
consistency47
change discipline100
review15
completed work—
153.72024.9003520,597Steady
11Akash Kumar
AkashKyma
6767%
infrastructure17
consistency50
change discipline100
review15
craft99
completed work—
177.02119.60068999,538Steady

⚑ 2 flags

12Jitu Prosad Saha
jitusaha11
6253%
infrastructure13
craft88
consistency47
change discipline100
review15
completed work—
165.31927.6004665,094Steady
13Rushikesh Powar
rushikesh-swe
5989%
infrastructure14
change discipline73
craft90
review15
consistency57
completed work—
161.91941.8005790,460Steady
14Pranav Ojha
Pranav173261
5739%
craft46
consistency41
change discipline100
review15
completed work—
infrastructure—
135.11833.20043117,497Steady
·Rishav Raj
rishav1238
—24%too little data to rank in this period190.82540.800632,646Unrankable

⚑ 2 flags

·mohammad saad
not linked
—0%identity unmapped169.52320.8————Unlinked

⚑ 1 flag

·Rushendra Varma Mudunuru
not linked
—88%identity unmapped153.4249.1————Unlinked

⚑ 1 flag

·Anmol Music
not linked
—0%identity unmapped122.71927.1————Unlinked

⚑ 1 flag

·Srija Bandapally
not linked
—0%identity unmapped16.1327.6————Unlinked

⚑ 1 flag

·Srija Bandapally
not linked
—0%identity unmapped1.4220.2————Unlinked

⚑ 1 flag

·Shakir Khan
not linked
—0%identity unmapped1.0260.5————Unlinked

⚑ 1 flag

·Claude Code
claude
—100%no code in this period0.00—00144Outside cohort
·Cursor Agent
cursor-agent
—100%no code in this period0.00—006896Outside cohort
·Ruhani Allagh
not linked
——no code in this period0.00—————Outside cohort

Only people with a published score carry a rank. A dot means this period cannot place them — not that they placed last.

How to read this table

Three sentences that separate a fair dashboard from a harmful one.

  • A dash is not a zero. 6 people have no code account linked. They get no signal at all — printing 0 would assert they produced nothing.
  • “No code” is a question. 0 tracked time and landed nothing in these repos. The work may not be code, or may live where this platform cannot see.
  • Seen is the share of someone’s known working days that produced a commit, review, task or infrastructure change. It never changes a score — it says what the score is about. Below 35% the comparative band is withheld entirely: calling someone “behind” on a fifth of the evidence is a verdict this data cannot support.

    Hours and lines are never scored. They are shown for context.