E

EmpCloud

conf 0.55

Thunder Marketing · 1Touch-dev

Team

21 people · 12 produced code · 777h tracked

2026-09-19 → 2026-09-26 · showing up to 2026-09-26 · live data last updated 26 Sept, 08:33 UTC

People

21

with tracked time or code

Producing code

12

rankable cohort

Tracked time but no code

3

a question, not a verdict

No code account linked

4

no signal at all — never a low one

Not ranked on code

0

role is not code delivery

Roster

Sorted by signal. Click any name for the evidence behind their number.

#PersonSignalSeenComponentsHoursDaysAct%PRsMergedCommitsLinesStatus
1Pramod Soni
PRAMODS0NI
8440%
consistency27
change discipline100
craft99
completed work—
infrastructure—
review—
43.0530.300146,621Steady
2Pankaj Kumar
pankaj1touch
83100%
change discipline70
craft92
consistency60
infrastructure100
completed work—
review—
52.9625.900496Steady
3Ankur Kumar
ankur1touch
82100%
change discipline100
consistency55
infrastructure54
craft100
completed work—
review—
67.0829.3002917,217Steady
4Abhishek Kulkarni
Abhishek9302
8120%
consistency50
infrastructure50
change discipline100
craft99
completed work—
review—
44.4523.60032,419Steady
5Harsh Patel
harsh-kyma
79100%
craft63
change discipline100
consistency57
infrastructure100
completed work—
review—
44.5627001923,670Steady
6Anshuman Parmar
anshumankyma
7980%
change discipline93
consistency54
craft98
infrastructure53
completed work—
review—
34.6524.500101,629Steady
7Manish Chandrakar
manishKyma
7857%
change discipline69
craft93
consistency61
completed work—
infrastructure—
review—
48.8718.7002651,027Steady
8Rishav Raj
rishav1238
7814%
change discipline80
consistency32
craft98
completed work—
infrastructure—
review—
46.6749.10014,818Steady

⚑ 1 flag

9Aziz Bohra
AzizBohraKyma
78100%
infrastructure36
change discipline100
consistency55
craft99
completed work—
review—
45.1535.7001163,366Steady
10Dhiraj Ambekar
Dhiraj4113
7320%
infrastructure35
craft90
consistency45
change discipline100
completed work—
review—
40.5523.6002186Steady
11Rushikesh Powar
rushikesh-swe
6380%
infrastructure13
change discipline73
craft90
consistency55
completed work—
review—
37.3547.300107,538Steady
12Pranav Ojha
Pranav173261
6250%
craft46
consistency39
change discipline100
completed work—
infrastructure—
review—
16.6235.1001626,511Steady
·mohammad saad
not linked
—0%identity unmapped63.8814.3————Unlinked

⚑ 1 flag

·MOHD NAVED
MohdNaved123
—0%no code in this period48.0628.90000No code

⚑ 1 flag

·Jitu Prosad Saha
jitusaha11
—20%no code in this period45.0531.80000No code

⚑ 1 flag

·Rushendra Varma Mudunuru
not linked
—67%identity unmapped43.2610.9————Unlinked

⚑ 1 flag

·Akash Kumar
AkashKyma
—25%no code in this period33.9420.20000No code

⚑ 1 flag

·Anmol Music
not linked
—0%identity unmapped20.2528.1————Unlinked

⚑ 1 flag

·Srija Bandapally
not linked
—0%identity unmapped1.4220.2————Unlinked

⚑ 1 flag

·Ruhani Allagh
not linked
——no code in this period0.00—————Outside cohort
·Srija Bandapally
not linked
——no code in this period0.00—————Outside cohort

Only people with a published score carry a rank. A dot means this period cannot place them — not that they placed last.

How to read this table

Three sentences that separate a fair dashboard from a harmful one.

  • A dash is not a zero. 4 people have no code account linked. They get no signal at all — printing 0 would assert they produced nothing.
  • “No code” is a question. 3 tracked time and landed nothing in these repos. The work may not be code, or may live where this platform cannot see.
  • Seen is the share of someone’s known working days that produced a commit, review, task or infrastructure change. It never changes a score — it says what the score is about. Below 35% the comparative band is withheld entirely: calling someone “behind” on a fifth of the evidence is a verdict this data cannot support.

    Hours and lines are never scored. They are shown for context.