E

EmpCloud

conf 0.55

Thunder Marketing · 1Touch-dev

Team

22 people · 11 produced code · 773h tracked

2026-09-20 → 2026-09-27 · showing up to 2026-09-27 · live data last updated 27 Sept, 05:01 UTC

People

22

with tracked time or code

Producing code

11

rankable cohort

Tracked time but no code

3

a question, not a verdict

No code account linked

5

no signal at all — never a low one

Not ranked on code

0

role is not code delivery

Roster

Sorted by signal. Click any name for the evidence behind their number.

#PersonSignalSeenComponentsHoursDaysAct%PRsMergedCommitsLinesStatus
1Pankaj Kumar
pankaj1touch
84100%
change discipline72
craft94
consistency61
infrastructure100
completed work—
review—
55.6624.500496Steady
2Pramod Soni
PRAMODS0NI
8440%
consistency28
change discipline100
craft99
completed work—
infrastructure—
review—
43.0530.300146,621Steady
3Ankur Kumar
ankur1touch
8388%
change discipline100
consistency56
infrastructure58
craft100
completed work—
review—
62.9829.7001916,405Steady
4Abhishek Kulkarni
Abhishek9302
8120%
infrastructure50
consistency50
change discipline100
craft99
completed work—
review—
44.4523.60032,419Steady
5Harsh Patel
harsh-kyma
80100%
craft65
change discipline100
consistency57
infrastructure100
completed work—
review—
44.8727.2001923,670Steady
6Anshuman Parmar
anshumankyma
8080%
change discipline94
consistency54
infrastructure56
craft98
completed work—
review—
40.5525.200101,629Steady
7Aziz Bohra
AzizBohraKyma
7967%
infrastructure38
change discipline100
consistency56
craft99
completed work—
review—
48.5634.300562,608Steady
8Manish Chandrakar
manishKyma
7950%
change discipline70
craft93
consistency62
completed work—
infrastructure—
review—
41.1618.4001730,920Steady
9Dhiraj Ambekar
Dhiraj4113
7320%
infrastructure35
consistency46
craft90
change discipline100
completed work—
review—
40.5523.6002186Steady
10Rushikesh Powar
rushikesh-swe
6380%
infrastructure14
change discipline73
craft90
consistency55
completed work—
review—
42.454700107,538Steady
11Pranav Ojha
Pranav173261
6250%
craft46
consistency40
change discipline100
completed work—
infrastructure—
review—
16.6235.1001626,511Steady
·mohammad saad
not linked
—0%identity unmapped60.2714.7————Unlinked

⚑ 1 flag

·Jitu Prosad Saha
jitusaha11
—20%no code in this period45.0531.80000No code

⚑ 1 flag

·Rushendra Varma Mudunuru
not linked
—83%identity unmapped43.2610.9————Unlinked

⚑ 1 flag

·Rishav Raj
rishav1238
—17%too little data to rank in this period40.1649.70014,818Unrankable

⚑ 1 flag

·MOHD NAVED
MohdNaved123
—0%no code in this period40.1530.90000No code

⚑ 1 flag

·Akash Kumar
AkashKyma
—25%no code in this period33.9420.20000No code

⚑ 1 flag

·Anmol Music
not linked
—0%identity unmapped27.5632.8————Unlinked

⚑ 1 flag

·Srija Bandapally
not linked
—0%identity unmapped1.4220.2————Unlinked

⚑ 1 flag

·Shakir Khan
not linked
—0%identity unmapped1.0260.5————Unlinked

⚑ 1 flag

·Ruhani Allagh
not linked
——no code in this period0.00—————Outside cohort
·Srija Bandapally
not linked
——no code in this period0.00—————Outside cohort

Only people with a published score carry a rank. A dot means this period cannot place them — not that they placed last.

How to read this table

Three sentences that separate a fair dashboard from a harmful one.

  • A dash is not a zero. 5 people have no code account linked. They get no signal at all — printing 0 would assert they produced nothing.
  • “No code” is a question. 3 tracked time and landed nothing in these repos. The work may not be code, or may live where this platform cannot see.
  • Seen is the share of someone’s known working days that produced a commit, review, task or infrastructure change. It never changes a score — it says what the score is about. Below 35% the comparative band is withheld entirely: calling someone “behind” on a fifth of the evidence is a verdict this data cannot support.

    Hours and lines are never scored. They are shown for context.