E

EmpCloud

conf 0.55

Thunder Marketing · 1Touch-dev

Team

23 people · 14 produced code · 675h tracked

2026-09-22 → 2026-09-29 · showing up to 2026-09-29 · live data last updated 28 Sept, 05:07 UTC

People

23

with tracked time or code

Producing code

14

rankable cohort

Tracked time but no code

1

a question, not a verdict

No code account linked

5

no signal at all — never a low one

Not ranked on code

0

role is not code delivery

Roster

Sorted by signal. Click any name for the evidence behind their number.

#PersonSignalSeenComponentsHoursDaysAct%PRsMergedCommitsLinesStatus
1Pankaj Kumar
pankaj1touch
8886%
change discipline88
craft96
consistency57
infrastructure100
completed work—
review—
51.3724.700124,233Leading
2Ankur Kumar
ankur1touch
85100%
change discipline100
craft100
consistency57
infrastructure65
completed work—
review—
50.7631.6004549,835Leading
3Pramod Soni
PRAMODS0NI
85100%
consistency34
change discipline100
craft99
completed work—
infrastructure—
review—
35.1530.2003327,588Leading
4Anshuman Parmar
anshumankyma
83100%
craft98
change discipline100
consistency54
infrastructure63
completed work—
review—
48.2626.3131174344,195Leading
5Harsh Patel
harsh-kyma
83100%
craft74
change discipline100
consistency56
infrastructure100
completed work—
review—
41.8631.431308981,984Leading
6Abhishek Kulkarni
Abhishek9302
8180%
consistency50
change discipline100
infrastructure50
craft99
completed work—
review—
37.6524.6001910,140Steady
7Manish Chandrakar
manishKyma
8167%
change discipline80
craft94
consistency57
completed work—
infrastructure—
review—
34.0619.6003733,000Steady
8Aziz Bohra
AzizBohraKyma
80100%
infrastructure43
change discipline100
craft99
consistency58
completed work—
review—
41.3635.1333032,137Steady
9Rishav Raj
rishav1238
7780%
change discipline75
consistency35
craft99
completed work—
infrastructure—
review—
33.1551.51099,450Steady
10Dhiraj Ambekar
Dhiraj4113
7380%
craft85
infrastructure40
consistency48
change discipline100
completed work—
review—
32.6520.810116,092Behind
11Akash Kumar
AkashKyma
7367%
infrastructure19
consistency46
change discipline100
craft99
completed work—
review—
26.7320.30079,804Behind
12Jitu Prosad Saha
jitusaha11
6760%
infrastructure15
craft87
consistency44
change discipline100
completed work—
review—
38.1530.7001444,319Behind
13Rushikesh Powar
rushikesh-swe
6380%
infrastructure16
change discipline74
craft89
consistency53
completed work—
review—
34.5549.90023110,931Behind
14Pranav Ojha
Pranav173261
6150%
craft46
consistency35
change discipline100
completed work—
infrastructure—
review—
16.6235.1001626,511Behind
·mohammad saad
not linked
—0%identity unmapped49.8711.1————Unlinked

⚑ 1 flag

·MOHD NAVED
MohdNaved123
—0%no code in this period35.2529.20000No code

⚑ 1 flag

·Rushendra Varma Mudunuru
not linked
—100%identity unmapped33.9412.2————Unlinked

⚑ 1 flag

·Anmol Music
not linked
—0%identity unmapped32.2539.6————Unlinked

⚑ 1 flag

·Srija Bandapally
not linked
—0%identity unmapped1.5219.2————Unlinked

⚑ 1 flag

·Shakir Khan
not linked
—0%identity unmapped1.0260.5————Unlinked

⚑ 1 flag

·1Touch Dev
agent@1touch.dev
—100%no code in this period0.00—00152,122Outside cohort
·Ruhani Allagh
not linked
——no code in this period0.00—————Outside cohort
·Srija Bandapally
not linked
——no code in this period0.00—————Outside cohort

Only people with a published score carry a rank. A dot means this period cannot place them — not that they placed last.

How to read this table

Three sentences that separate a fair dashboard from a harmful one.

  • A dash is not a zero. 5 people have no code account linked. They get no signal at all — printing 0 would assert they produced nothing.
  • “No code” is a question. 1 tracked time and landed nothing in these repos. The work may not be code, or may live where this platform cannot see.
  • Seen is the share of someone’s known working days that produced a commit, review, task or infrastructure change. It never changes a score — it says what the score is about. Below 35% the comparative band is withheld entirely: calling someone “behind” on a fifth of the evidence is a verdict this data cannot support.

    Hours and lines are never scored. They are shown for context.