People
25
with tracked time or code
Producing code
14
rankable cohort
Tracked time but no code
1
a question, not a verdict
No code account linked
6
no signal at all — never a low one
Not ranked on code
0
role is not code delivery
Roster
Sorted by signal. Click any name for the evidence behind their number.
| # | Person | Signal | Seen | Components | Hours | Days | Act% | PRs | Merged | Commits | Lines | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pankaj Kumar pankaj1touch | 88 | 71% | change discipline88 craft96 consistency58 infrastructure100 completed work— review— | 51.8 | 7 | 22.4 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 4,233 | Steady |
| 2 | Ankur Kumar ankur1touch | 85 | 100% | change discipline100 craft100 consistency61 infrastructure63 completed work— review— | 53.8 | 7 | 29.1 | 0 | 0 | 43 | 44,987 | Steady |
| 3 | Anshuman Parmar anshumankyma | 85 | 100% | craft98 change discipline100 consistency58 infrastructure67 completed work— review— | 51.8 | 7 | 29.4 | 24 | 21 | 95 | 352,145 | Steady |
| 4 | Pramod Soni PRAMODS0NI | 85 | 80% | consistency35 craft99 change discipline100 completed work— infrastructure— review— | 36.3 | 5 | 34.7 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 24,786 | Steady |
| 5 | MOHD NAVED MohdNaved123 | 84 | 17% | change discipline88 consistency45 craft99 completed work— infrastructure— review— | 36.5 | 6 | 26.3 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 10,388 | Steady |
| 6 | Harsh Patel harsh-kyma | 83 | 100% | craft74 change discipline100 consistency58 infrastructure100 completed work— review— | 34.4 | 5 | 34.5 | 31 | 30 | 77 | 62,065 | Steady |
| 7 | Aziz Bohra AzizBohraKyma | 81 | 100% | infrastructure43 craft99 change discipline100 consistency61 completed work— review— | 43.1 | 6 | 29.8 | 5 | 5 | 51 | 37,478 | Steady |
| 8 | Abhishek Kulkarni Abhishek9302 | 81 | 80% | consistency52 craft99 change discipline100 infrastructure50 completed work— review— | 37.6 | 5 | 25.2 | 2 | 0 | 22 | 10,040 | Steady |
| 9 | Manish Chandrakar manishKyma | 80 | 67% | change discipline77 craft92 consistency60 completed work— infrastructure— review— | 34.0 | 6 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 39 | 47,151 | Steady |
| 10 | Rishav Raj rishav1238 | 77 | 80% | change discipline75 consistency36 craft99 completed work— infrastructure— review— | 30.1 | 5 | 48.7 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 9,450 | Steady |
| 11 | Akash Kumar AkashKyma | 74 | 60% | infrastructure19 consistency49 craft99 change discipline100 completed work— review— | 35.5 | 5 | 20 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 14,774 | Steady |
| 12 | Dhiraj Ambekar Dhiraj4113 | 73 | 80% | craft85 infrastructure40 consistency50 change discipline100 completed work— review— | 32.9 | 5 | 21.5 | 1 | 0 | 19 | 9,726 | Steady |
| 13 | Jitu Prosad Saha jitusaha11 | 68 | 80% | infrastructure15 craft87 consistency46 change discipline100 completed work— review— | 37.3 | 5 | 32.6 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 44,342 | Steady |
| 14 | Rushikesh Powar rushikesh-swe | 64 | 80% | infrastructure16 change discipline74 craft89 consistency56 completed work— review— | 35.9 | 5 | 51.7 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 109,765 | Steady |
| · | mohammad saad not linked | — | 0% | identity unmapped | 50.8 | 7 | 10.1 | — | — | — | — | Unlinked ⚑ 1 flag |
| · | Anmol Music not linked | — | 0% | identity unmapped | 32.1 | 5 | 42.7 | — | — | — | — | Unlinked ⚑ 1 flag |
| · | Rushendra Varma Mudunuru not linked | — | 100% | identity unmapped | 26.1 | 3 | 12.5 | — | — | — | — | Unlinked ⚑ 1 flag |
| · | Pranav Ojha Pranav173261 | — | 0% | no code in this period | 5.9 | 1 | 30.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | No code |
| · | Shakir Khan not linked | — | 0% | identity unmapped | 4.1 | 4 | 40.2 | — | — | — | — | Unlinked ⚑ 1 flag |
| · | Srija Bandapally not linked | — | 0% | identity unmapped | 2.2 | 3 | 29.3 | — | — | — | — | Unlinked ⚑ 1 flag |
| · | Wasiu Adepoju not linked | — | 0% | identity unmapped | 0.0 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | Unlinked ⚑ 1 flag |
| · | 1Touch Dev agent@1touch.dev | — | 100% | no code in this period | 0.0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 15 | 2,122 | Outside cohort |
| · | Ruhani Allagh not linked | — | — | no code in this period | 0.0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | Outside cohort |
| · | Srija Bandapally not linked | — | — | no code in this period | 0.0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | Outside cohort |
| · | Ubuntu Paperclip ubuntu@paperclip | — | 100% | no code in this period | 0.0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2,631 | Outside cohort |
Only people with a published score carry a rank. A dot means this period cannot place them — not that they placed last.
How to read this table
Three sentences that separate a fair dashboard from a harmful one.
- A dash is not a zero. 6 people have no code account linked. They get no signal at all — printing 0 would assert they produced nothing.
- “No code” is a question. 1 tracked time and landed nothing in these repos. The work may not be code, or may live where this platform cannot see.
- Seen is the share of someone’s known working days that produced a commit, review, task or infrastructure change. It never changes a score — it says what the score is about. Below 35% the comparative band is withheld entirely: calling someone “behind” on a fifth of the evidence is a verdict this data cannot support.
Hours and lines are never scored. They are shown for context.